Opened 19 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#3422 closed patch (fixed)
Allow request of specific tuner from EXEC-like interface
| Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | cpinkham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.22 |
| Component: | mythtv | Version: | head |
| Severity: | medium | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Ticket locked: | no |
Description
Currently it is not possible to select which tuner is required from EXECTV. I have a situation where I have one analog card and one DVB card. I wanted to be able to request use of the analog card (connected to a set top box), so that I could use the TV on demand features of the box, while being sure that Myth would know the tuner was in use.
To this end, I have implemented a new XML menu keyword: EXECSOURCE. This requires one parameter that corresponds to a cardid in the database, and requests that card in particular from the backend. In all other ways this feature is the same as EXECTV.
I have added a new mythui-style DialogBox to give feedback, not sure if this was the right thing to do as the EXECTV DialogBox was #ifdef 0'ed out.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
by , 19 years ago
| Attachment: | 3422.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
| Milestone: | unknown → 0.22 |
|---|
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
| Type: | enhancement → patch |
|---|
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
(In [21428]) Modify the EXECTV menu action and the corresponding LOCK_TUNER backend command to take an optional cardid. Several people have requested the ability to lock a specific tuner for one reason or another. This patch enables that ability.
To use EXECTV, just insert the cardid after EXECTV before the command to run:
EXECTV 3 /usr/bin/tvtime
The LOCK_TUNER backend command now takes an optional CARDID:
LOCK_TUNER 3
Closes #3422 using my own patch.

Is there any interest in this patch at all? It's quite small to review.